Survey shows many hiring managers are not bashful about trolling applicants online.

It’s funny.

(Not “ha ha!” funny. Just, employment-law blogger, wry-smile funny).

I read different surveys about social media and hiring and the numbers vary greatly. For every survey that indicates that employers are not using social media to vet candidates, you get the one I read last night from CareerBuilder.com, which reports that “fifty-two percent of employers use social networking sites to research job candidates, up significantly from 43 percent last year and 39 percent in 2013.”

I think we can harmonize these disparate survey results by distinguishing between sourcing candidates on the one hand, and then vetting candidates with a social media background check on the back end; the former being much more prevalent. I get that.

Hiring managers like friending and following candidates.

But, here’s an interesting statistic from the CareerBuilder.com survey of more than 2,000 full-time, U.S. hiring and human resources managers across industries and company sizes, “35 percent of employers who screen via social networks have requested to ‘be a friend’ or follow candidates that have private accounts. Of that group, 80 percent say they’ve been granted permission.”

Here, I’m going to assume that we are talking primarily about LinkedIn (versus Facebook or even Twitter).

So, ok, that makes more sense, especially when you consider that the survey shows that 60 percent of those who screen candidates online are “looking for information that supports their qualifications for the job,” and “56 percent of recruiters want to see if the candidate has a professional online persona.”

What else matters when vetting a candidate.

According to the survey, turn-ons include:

Provocative or inappropriate photographs – 46 percent
Information about candidate drinking or using drugs – 40 percent
Candidate bad-mouthed previous company or fellow employee – 34 percent
Poor communication skills – 30 percent
Discriminatory comments related to race, religion, gender, etc. – 29 percent

Oh, wait. I meant turn-offs. Here are the turn-ons:

Candidate’s background information supported job qualifications –42 percent
Candidate’s personality came across as good fit with company culture – 38 percent
Candidate’s site conveyed a professional image – 38 percent
Candidate had great communication skills – 37 percent
Candidate was creative – 36 percent

A few things to remember when vetting candidates online.

Don’t make a hiring decision based on protected class information. Well, duh. And, you can reduce the risk by quarantining as much protected-class information learned online as possible from the final decision-maker.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act may apply. Indeed, it does if you have a third party run a social media background check.
Never require an applicant to friend of connect with you. That’s just creepy. It’s also illegal in about half of the United States.

[Music]