Articles Posted in Hiring & Firing

| by

noun-waiting-5324021-1024x1024
For several weeks, employment law and HR professionals have been hearing about the term “illegal DEI.” But what did “illegal DEI” actually mean—especially to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal discrimination watchdog? Until recently, that was anyone’s guess.

That changed yesterday when the EEOC issued guidance clarifying when DEI initiatives might cross the line into unlawful discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Guidance is a technical assistance document released without an EEOC quorum. So, it’s not a rule or a law. Still, here’s what employers need to know about it.

When is a DEI Initiative Unlawful?

Continue reading

| by

noun-security-7629746-1024x1024

Recently, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has garnered headlines (and blog posts) over a shift in enforcement priorities to issues such as “anti-American” bias in hiring and defending women’s rights to single-sex spaces, such as bathrooms and locker rooms, in the workplace. To say these were previously on the backburner would be an understatement, unless the stove had ten or so rows of burners.

But, don’t get it twisted. Continue reading

| by

noun-job-posting-6287878-1024x1024

Diversity, equity, and inclusion—better known as DEI—has been a hot topic lately. While DEI itself isn’t inherently illegal, critics have latched onto the idea of so-called “illegal DEI.” What exactly does that mean? Unclear. But a recent federal court case involving a law student who said she was discouraged from applying for a summer internship because of diversity-focused hiring criteria was giving me “illegal DEI” vibes.

The catch? Even if everything she claimed was true, the court never actually ruled on whether the hiring policy was legal or not. Here’s why.

The Lawsuit That Never Got Off the Ground

Continue reading

| by

noun-rainbow-2212997-1024x1024

Some people seem to think the workplace is their personal soapbox, where they can broadcast whatever pops into their heads—no matter how offensive, misguided, or just plain dumb. One former employee learned this the hard way when he posted an anti-LGBTQ+ comment on the company intranet, mistakenly thinking it was an anonymous survey response. His employer quickly shut that down, and so did the courts. When he appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, hoping for a lifeline, the justices responded yesterday with a firm “no thanks.”

Turns out, the highest court in the land had better things to do than entertain a “my bigotry is protected” argument. Continue reading

| by

noun-calendar-6553648-1024x1024

Especially if you’re gonna claim discrimination when you eventually get fired.

That’s among the takeaways from a recent federal appellate court ruling reinforcing the importance of enforcing workplace policies, particularly those related to safety. Continue reading

| by

noun-supreme-court-149365
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, a case where a heterosexual employee claimed her employer discriminated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The key legal question isn’t whether she has a claim but whether plaintiffs in the so-called “majority” must clear an additional hurdle—proving “background circumstances” that show their employer is an unusual one that discriminates against the majority.

I don’t have a crystal ball, but maybe artificial intelligence does. I uploaded the oral argument transcript and asked three separate AI assistants (Harvey.AI, ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot) to predict how each justice will rule and why. All three foresee a unanimous decision to scrap the “background circumstances” test. Here’s why:

Continue reading

| by

noun-gavel-103096-1024x1024

A federal judge in Maryland has issued a nationwide injunction halting key provisions of two executive orders that sought to limit workplace diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. The ruling means that, for now, employers—especially federal contractors and grant recipients—can continue their DEI efforts without immediate legal risk. Continue reading

| by

noun-workplace-inclusivity-7133054-1-1024x1024

President Trump’s recent Executive Order, “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” has raised pressing questions about the future of workplace diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The order emphasizes enforcing civil rights laws, eliminating race- and sex-based preferences in federal policies, and promoting merit-based opportunities. In response, many employers are wondering: What does this mean for DEI programs in the private sector? Continue reading

“Doing What’s Right – Not Just What’s Legal”
Contact Information

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2025, Eric B. Meyer
| All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design