Articles Posted in Sex

| by

noun-podcast-7283198-1024x1024

Employers striving to enhance diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) have faced stiff headwinds recently from the federal government. The EEOC’s latest release, “What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work,” is more about what employers can’t do than what they can to promote DEI.

Underscoring the importance of caution, the EEOC has reminded employers that race, sex, or ethnicity-based preferences in DEI programs risk violating anti-discrimination laws. These announcements specifically warn against quotas, explicit racial or gender preferences, and any programs that could create perceived or real discriminatory outcomes.

The guidance aims to “help employers take action to avoid unlawful DEI-related discrimination,” noted EEOC Acting Chair Andrea Lucas.

But are there lawful actions employers can take to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion principles?

Yes. Ms. Lucas herself provided eleven solutions last year on an episode of Cozen O’Connor’s Employment Law Now podcast, hosted by Michael Schmidt. You can listen to them starting at 31:33 in the recording. Additionally, I’ve summarized them below. Continue reading

| by

And Kendrick Lamar and Drake may co-host a TED Talk on conflict resolution, the Dallas Cowboys may win the Super Bowl next year, and a job applicant may answer the “What’s your biggest weakness?” question honestly.

Let’s talk about why training on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) is unlikely to lead to a viable hostile work environment claim. Continue reading

| by

noun-waiting-5324021-1024x1024
For several weeks, employment law and HR professionals have been hearing about the term “illegal DEI.” But what did “illegal DEI” actually mean—especially to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal discrimination watchdog? Until recently, that was anyone’s guess.

That changed yesterday when the EEOC issued guidance clarifying when DEI initiatives might cross the line into unlawful discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Guidance is a technical assistance document released without an EEOC quorum. So, it’s not a rule or a law. Still, here’s what employers need to know about it.

When is a DEI Initiative Unlawful?

Continue reading

| by

noun-gavel-103096-1024x1024

Despite two deciding judges expressing support for DEI, the Fourth Circuit unanimously ruled on Friday that two Executive Orders issued by President Trump, which seek to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives from federal grant and contract processes, will remain in effect while legal challenges proceed. The Executive Orders claim that DEI programs promote race- and sex-based preferences that contradict American values of merit and hard work. Continue reading

| by

noun-security-7629746-1024x1024

Recently, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has garnered headlines (and blog posts) over a shift in enforcement priorities to issues such as “anti-American” bias in hiring and defending women’s rights to single-sex spaces, such as bathrooms and locker rooms, in the workplace. To say these were previously on the backburner would be an understatement, unless the stove had ten or so rows of burners.

But, don’t get it twisted. Continue reading

| by

noun-job-posting-6287878-1024x1024

Diversity, equity, and inclusion—better known as DEI—has been a hot topic lately. While DEI itself isn’t inherently illegal, critics have latched onto the idea of so-called “illegal DEI.” What exactly does that mean? Unclear. But a recent federal court case involving a law student who said she was discouraged from applying for a summer internship because of diversity-focused hiring criteria was giving me “illegal DEI” vibes.

The catch? Even if everything she claimed was true, the court never actually ruled on whether the hiring policy was legal or not. Here’s why.

The Lawsuit That Never Got Off the Ground

Continue reading

| by

noun-supreme-court-149365
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, a case where a heterosexual employee claimed her employer discriminated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The key legal question isn’t whether she has a claim but whether plaintiffs in the so-called “majority” must clear an additional hurdle—proving “background circumstances” that show their employer is an unusual one that discriminates against the majority.

I don’t have a crystal ball, but maybe artificial intelligence does. I uploaded the oral argument transcript and asked three separate AI assistants (Harvey.AI, ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot) to predict how each justice will rule and why. All three foresee a unanimous decision to scrap the “background circumstances” test. Here’s why:

Continue reading

| by

noun-transgender-3765678-1024x1024

On Saturday, the Associated Press reported that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) moved to drop several lawsuits related to gender identity discrimination. Let’s examine what caused this change in direction and the implications for employers. Continue reading

| by

noun-justice-2654086-1024x1024

On Wednesday, the Attorney General issued a memo titled “Ending Illegal DEI and DEIA Discrimination and Preferences,” a move poised to send ripples through the private and educational sectors. Aligned with President Trump’s Executive Order on January 21, 2025, this directive targets diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI), and diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) practices that discriminate based on race or sex. Employers must act now to ensure compliance and avoid potential legal challenges. Continue reading

“Doing What’s Right – Not Just What’s Legal”
Contact Information

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2025, Eric B. Meyer
| All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design