https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5rRZdiu1UE If Cochese and Bobby, “The Rookie” were working mall security in Pennsylvania, would their employer have to pay them for the time they spend keeping those uniforms looking 80s-spiffy? If it were up to one Pennsylvania federal court, they would be SOL. You’ll see what I mean once you…
The Employer Handbook Blog
Last call! Bloggers wanted for the “Employment Law Blog Carnival”
Wouldn’t it be nice if you could find a single online resource with links to a slew of topical blog posts about a particular topic or area — say, employment law? Well, I have a solution. But I need your help…to create a blog carnival. What is a blog carnival,…
Can a bridge worker with a fear of heights have a viable ADA claim?
Today, I get to sleep in because The Employer Handbook has a guest blogger. It’s Andrew Kim, a summer associate at Dilworth Paxson LLP: * * * Some people have no problem with heights (as seen above). But Darrell Miller, a bridge worker, had acrophobia (a.k.a. the fear of heights).…
EEOC buzz: deliberate discrimination against job seekers
Yesterday, the EEOC held a meeting to discuss what it deems a “major national problem”; namely, deliberate discrimination against job seekers based on their race, sex, age, national origin or other prohibited basis. After the jump, I’ll summarize the meeting and offer some tips for employers to help them stay…
BEWARE EMPLOYERS: Overhauled union-election rules may be near
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has proposed amendments to its existing rules and regulations that will vastly change the way union-elections are conducted. The NLRB spin on these amendments is that they will “reduce unnecessary litigation, streamline pre- and post-election procedures, and facilitate the use of electronic communications and…
What Wal-Mart’s High Court win means for employers, large and small
As reported on this blog yesterday, as well as in a gazillion other news outlets — but probably here first firstish — the U.S. Supreme Court has overturned certification of a potential class of 1.5 million current and former female employees seeking relief against Wal-Mart for alleged gender discrimination. After…
BREAKING: Supreme Court reverses Wal-Mart v. Dukes class action
The United States Supreme Court has just overturned a Ninth Circuit decision that would have allowed 1.5 million female employees to pursue a class-action gender discrimination lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. You can read a copy of the Supreme Court’s opinion here. I’ll have more on this decision tomorrow at…
$1,000 fine per day for not posting notice of harassment verdict
There once was an employer in Racine. With a manager whose antics were racy. The court said, “You lose!” Now, tell everyone the news. And if you disobey, it’ll cost you big money. *** Although I feel rhyming “Racine” with “racy” was pure Shakespeare, I’m fairly certain that Edward Lear’s…
Juror + defendant + Facebook = 8 months in prison
In the workplace, messing around on Facebook may earn an employee a pink slip. In the political arena, Facebook faux pas can cost a Congressman his seat in Congress — although it could result in a job with Hustler. [SFW]. But, in the courtroom, Facebook shenanigans may lead to hard time in…
The Boston Bruins are Stanley Cup Champions!!!
Come on, folks. What else did you expect? Photo Credit: Elsa/Getty Images