Close

The Employer Handbook Blog

Updated:

Four federal agencies are prepared to throw cold water (and lawsuits) at employers who abuse artificial intelligence

While recognizing the prevalence of automated systems, including those sometimes marketed as “artificial intelligence” or “AI,” and the “insights and breakthroughs, increasing efficiencies and cost-savings” that AI can offer, four federal agencies recently announced in a joint statement that they are ready to police “unlawful bias,” “unlawful discrimination,” and “other…

Updated:

Take it from the feds (literally!). Here are 12 EEOC-recommended ways to LEVEL-UP your company’s anti-harassment efforts.

For me, yesterday was all about the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In the morning and for most of the afternoon, I served as a volunteer EEOC mediator to help resolve a Charge of Discrimination. After completing my service, I chilled out with a copy of the EEOC’s new technical…

Updated:

When employees claim that your company failed to pay their overtime, you win if your company does this.

The Fair Labor Standards Act requires employers to pay covered nonexempt workers overtime pay at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay after 40 hours of work in a workweek. So what happens when employees claim not to receive premium overtime pay despite…

Updated:

If the same person sexually harasses a man and a woman, does that cancel each other out?

MicroZesTo, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons If you’re asking that question to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the answer is no. At the end of last week, the EEOC announced that it had sued two companies allegedly violating federal law when they failed to prevent and correct ongoing…

Updated:

What do you do with employees who refuse to use a coworker’s preferred pronouns?

You develop policies and train everyone — especially your managers — on how to handle situations like the example I have for you today. This lawsuit involves a plaintiff who filed a complaint — remember, these are just allegations — stating that she routinely interacted with a coworker with female…

Updated:

A new bill in Congress would protect civil rights at work from religious freedoms

Yesterday, on the same day that some of the Supreme Court noted that Congress hadn’t changed Title VII’s undue hardship standard for religious accommodations, the House and Senate reintroduced the Do No Harm Act, which the bill sponsors claim will “address the increasing use of religious freedom as a justification…

Updated:

Wait, what? Court says ‘good fit’ isn’t necessarily code for discrimination or retaliation.

Employment lawyers and HR professionals generally preach that employees view “it’s not a good fit” to explain their termination of employment as code for discrimination or retaliation. It’s HR101. But yesterday, a federal court of appeals explained that this well-intentioned but often misconstrued rationale isn’t always a thinly-veiled, pretextual excuse…

Updated:

Choose your words carefully when using noncompetition agreements

  Many courts are generally reluctant to enforce noncompetes. And sometimes employers make their tasks even easier. For example, I read a state appellate court decision last night in which a company tried to enforce a three-year, thirty-mile noncompete against its former nurse practitioner that would prevent her from “provide[ing]…

Updated:

I’m naturally skeptical when an employee claims sexual orientation bias against straight people.

So when the plaintiff in this federal court decision I read last night cited as evidence of her employer’s heterosexual animus that her gay coworker received a cake and party by gay supervisors on his 30th work anniversary, whereas she did not receive cake or party for the same occasion,…

Updated:

Close counts in horseshoes and accommodating individuals with disabilities at work

Last night, I read a federal appellate court decision in which an employee with back spasms, sciatica, fibromyalgia, and pinched nerves claimed that her employer didn’t give her the help she needed to do her job. The plaintiff requested a “standing footrest” and “ergonomic chair” as reasonable accommodations. But she…