Close

Articles Posted in Pennsylvania

Updated:

Boy meets girl, dates girl, breaks up, calls girl “whore,” gets fired, sues for discrimination

Image credit: atom.smasher.org, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. When a male employee texted his female co-worker and former girlfriend that she was a “whore” and later ignored two protective orders that the female co-worker had taken out against him, I wonder if he was thinking, “Maybe,…

Updated:

It’s not disability discrimination when you don’t know about the disability.

William Wengert is HIV-positive. He worked as a certified nursing assistant for Phoebe Ministries, until he was terminated last year following an incident in which a resident suffered a broken leg. The company claimed that the incident with the resident precipitated the firing. Conversely, Wengert alleged that the company violated…

Updated:

Salty about Sandy: 20 Hurricane tweets from your employees

Hurricane Sandy: Day 2 To my east-coasters, I hope this post finds you safe and dry.   Me? Hey, thanks for asking. Our Philly home kept power throughout and we otherwise made it through unscathed. Still, Philadelphia remains in a state of emergency. The City is essentially shut down. Most of…

Updated:

Employee’s Twitter hatin’ costs him unemployment benefits

An employee getting fired for caustic social-media posts is so 2011. Having an application for unemployment-compensation benefits denied because of Twitter stupidity — that’s the new black. Details of a recent Commonwealth of Pennsylvania decision — don’t tread on me, Idaho — after the jump… * * * Stephen Burns…

Updated:

Fact or Fiction: Opposing an employee’s u/c request may be Title VII retaliation

That’s right folks. It’s time for another edition of “Fact or Fiction” a/k/a “Quick Answers to Quick Questions” a/k/a QATQQ f/k/a “I don’t feel like writing a long blog post.” Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, an employer engages in unlawful retaliation when, in response to an employee…

Updated:

Does the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act cover lost LinkedIn business opportunities?

powered by Fotopedia In the beginning of the year, I wrote here about a federal-court decision, which recognized that LinkedIn connections are not company trade secrets. Earlier this month, that same court, in the same case, was asked to decide whether hijacking an employee’s LinkedIn account may violate the Computer…

Updated:

That moment right before the pain begins: an EEOC subpoena

Back in July, I blogged here about a federal appellate court recently emphasizing just how broad the subpoena power of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission really is. [Editor’s Note: the technical legal term is “crazazy broad”] Last Friday, as I was hosting the weekly dip-spit distance shot organizing…

Updated:

Is an employee with managerial duties “similarly situated” to a manager?

  Maybe it’s the luck of the draw, but most of the discrimination cases I defend are hostile work environment cases, where an alleged harasser supposedly has made an employee-victim’s life miserable with certain comments, jokes, gestures, touchings, you name it. Far less often do I encounter disparate-treatment claims. A…